Does it seem odd that Engel is testing a "Turn Key" machine and that Visser is being oddly enough, criticized for not having the expertise and being able to meet standards in manufacturing the product? Doesn't turn key mean you plug the thing in and go to town with the confidence it is set up to make money with minimal experience?
There is a big ole black hole between those 2 harshly different scenarios.
Keep in mind, Visser invested millions. With favorable terms.
The more I consider all of the possibilities, the more I realize this may be bigger than it seems.
The last influx of financing came from dilution experts and increased the outstanding shares exponentially. Was that 12 million they got in that round? How much did it cost in shareholder value with regard to dilution? Visser is way to accomplished of a person to be associated with this.
Will LQMT ever be able to get honest favorable(compared to their true creditworthiness) financing like Visser again? Or will they be arranging future financing in seedy venues with all involved laughing at the lowly shareholders who will once again and over and over be bent.
You got learnin to do brother. I would start with Visser. The man volunteered to go to Vietnam and did his tour as a paratrooper. When he came back, started building his 100's of millions of dollars empire with poofy pillows. Much respect sir.
What has LQMT done. PR's explaining what they "gunna do someday" for years. Oh and spend investors money hand over fist with no profits to show for it. Oh yeah, diluted this thing from 5 mill to how many multiples of 100's of millions of shares there are outstanding now.
Double check my data and this is Just my opinion. Good luck sir.
