If you say so - I will respectfully disagree. Monetizing your company's products and services is the ONLY focus for any CEO ... intelligent or Doofas.
It is not Microsoft's responsibility to monetize Wave's offerings. It is not Microsoft that you invested in 15+ years ago. It is not Microsoft that made all of the decisions for Wave and its shareholders. It was not Microsoft's CEO that spent all of Wave's $100+ millions back in 1999 - 2001. Maybe in some roundabout way you might believe that. And if you do, then once must wonder why you invested in Wave instead of Microsoft.
Stanford University back in the mid 80s was responsible for the creation of an internet search engine that could rank relevant information based on content and its relevance to the keywords that one wanted to search on. So I ask you ... is Stanford University the owners of Google? Did the CEO of Google wait for someone else to monetize the vision? What I'm saying really I suppose is that there is no such thing as a succesful Doofas CEO. Doofas CEO's don't last. To be clear, I am NOT, nor did I label Steven anything. If you read my post, I did not even try to take any credit he may have earned away from him.
I merely stated that the past was the past, and that the focus of Wave NOW should be on figuring out if their product can be monetized, and then execute that plan to make it happen.If you are suggesting that we need to wait around for Microsoft to do it for them, then I will end my response as I began it.
I respectfully disagree
