I posted a link or a post #, in a recent post about this, from awhile back closer to when the whole question arose, where the real nature of the chill was explained to be not that big a deal as some would have others believe. I can't find that link now (maybe removed?) but I believe he was saying it was limited to Canadian mrkt & had other limits in scope. Figures it would be removed. Also, the chill is still in effect, (whatever it's scope is..), as reported in the latest (?) 2Q report from vplm.
I was searching for the post # of that post where it (seemingly) was better explained... (it was in the low 3000's)and I couldn't find it but got hung up instead, in a very lively discussion about what the company should/shouldn't report or PR. It was very interesting discussion. There was some pretty good sounding reasons posted by some, that explained why it was better the company did not say anything to investors about progress of supposed courting. There were some good pros & cons, just like more recently here, but none fit my particular take on it (biased pro). Anyway, while I was working my way back thru the discussion, seeking an orig post that got it all started, I came across a post that blew me away & trumped everything (hahaha)! All I will say, is this will prolly now get nuked (that's ok, as I will get the msg out regardless). The gist is: that the post takes a very clear side of the issue & validated that side w/"appropriate logic"... lol lol lol... however, that was earlier this year. Also, it so closely follows what I have clearly said very recently, that I could've easily written it, I mean it's is uncanny in its similar general sentiment, as well as the logic behind the sentiment... lol lol lol...and ADAMANT, lol, in the viewpoint! However, recently, when I did post those same exact sentiment and same exact reasonings behind it, lol lol...I don't have to remind anyone, lol, the full set of posts from an unnamed (but far more eloquent) writer, lol lol.
I find it immeasurably telling and, if this post isn't pulled, I cannot wait to see the the intricately, lol, lol, crafted responses by a few key posters. The post # I think was 3057. To those who have shown their tendency to ridicule certain things (if they happen to be "in pwr", well, you should allow it, as it's BIGTIME fodder for you...lol lol, so why cut your nose to spite your face? lol lol lol. #3057... ; < )
