InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 2228
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/26/2012

Re: ~MulaGreen~ post# 51019

Tuesday, 10/01/2013 1:45:31 PM

Tuesday, October 01, 2013 1:45:31 PM

Post# of 187251
Haha wow that's so misleading...

#4 3D is terrible on the eyes

So are smart phones, computer/tablet screens, oh and TVs (booth HD and Ultra HD) but those all seem to be doing pretty well.. Hell, I own all of the above, including 3D, and none of it has made me "painfully" ill (LMFAO)

#3 Most people who bought 3D TVs didn't actually use the 3D.

Agreed. Without readily available 3D content, there isn't much use for 3D. Even with content, not many people are interested in wearing glasses while viewing TV. That's where Clark Ortiz and TDEY come in... This company had a big following BEFORE the recent run. Why, you ask? 3D content and GLASSES-FREE 3D.

#2 3D makes gaming worse

Really? You mention ONE video game then claim it would worsen your experience? That's opinion, NOT fact. Moving on...

#1 There was simply never a demand for the technology, ever.

Just completely wrong. 3D technology is making the movie industry BILLIONS of MORE dollars, than standard def ever has. Countless movies are even being converted to 3D just so they can charge you an extra 3 bucks to see it. When it comes to TV, there just isn't any readily available content! The few channels that are available in 3D cost more to view and (again) people don't want to wear the glasses. Prime example is ESPN3D.
(See #3)