InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 5702
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/22/2004

Re: blshtry post# 20619

Saturday, 01/07/2006 2:14:40 AM

Saturday, January 07, 2006 2:14:40 AM

Post# of 60938
ill try to get an angle on what you are talking about re
the last issue, and then will forward it to a long that has
been in contact w/ clyw more frequently than I, if there is
anyone that get there attention its him,

as far as the seamless roaming, it imho is implied by the
billing shift, if the billing is seamless then so is the
call handoff (just thought of that now...), that's quite
an angle actualy and its almost as if a mouse trap is built
into Leon's patent, and if so, lol, kenito, uma etc has
fallen into it

longs, i think ive just set forth a profound implication of
the billing, i guess thats what u said blshtry when you ment
"broader", ty, i get it (and it seems that u got it before me)

ha, yes, so kineto thought it'd just disentangle the patent
and let uma handle the rest, sounds like Rambus all over it

just remember, uma will not get the skype folks imho w/o
some kind of rev sharing platform,

think about this, before there was sharing via roaming
agreements, but the offloading was like to like, now the
situation is highly complex and blanket agreements will be
nearly impossible to work out w/out sharing metrics, no one
is going to want to get those metrics on their own dime unless
there is some kind of sharing involved,

if the metrics are off some companies could dig themselves
into a hole that they cant get out of, the only guarentee of
this is sharing, further in order to get the small consumer
on board they will have to look at usage, they cant like
schedule a meeting and draft some kind of 5 year agreement
that's totally friggn impossible, i challange magoo bilcoln
stitch and all the rest of the bluballz to dispute that point

further small and med sized companies will be roughtly in the
same category, w/ out a graduated scale of savings the company
either will rip off people or make no money, everyone will
be looking for leverage, if its not all worked out to
begin with the bureacracy will be insurmountable.

in order for the system to work and keep and get customers
w/o going broke or loosing customers they will need a
billing switching system that roams or in the long run it will
become impractiable

its just the opposite from what some would say, that having
puters keep track of every move from a billing perspective
is intractable, the fact that the roaming is seamless means
that seamless billing switching is practible, there are just
no two ways about it, i realy hope that this is made clear
to any judge when defining any kind of settlement in any
future law suits

uma and kenito cant be allowed to conspire to disentangle the
clyw patent into parts saying that if one does this and the
other does that that there is no infringment since neither
by itself is infringing regardless of the synergetic
infringment that occurs when they combine patents

PUNATIVE DAMAGES on an order better than RMBS imho are in
store

guess the plot is thickening...

p2k

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.