InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 975
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/25/2012

Re: skers_9495 post# 34556

Thursday, 08/22/2013 5:34:16 PM

Thursday, August 22, 2013 5:34:16 PM

Post# of 232778
It is inconceivable that Steipp is not fully aware of VMatter cutlery. For him to suggest in the cc that he is not, is outrageous and an obvious breach of the trust he owes to his shareholders.. If VMatter is using our liquidmetal, which they acknowledge they are, what is the arrangement? Are they a licensee? What is the scope of apparent authority? What else will they or can they make? Anything non-consumer electronics? you're sure Apple wouldn't stand for that. Are we getting a license fee or royalties from VMatter? Steipp is a fiduciary. He must account for VMatters use of our name and product. In an earlier post I mentioned "corporate waste". A failure to account for an apparent misappropriation of our assets might easily be criminal. This is indeed serious and for Steipp to suggest that he's not familiar with the matter is unacceptable, at least to me.
I am heavily invested in this company and its technology. I don't want to see my investment squandered by ineptness. Please join me in asking for a simple statement as to why VMatter is using our name and our product.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News