Would you like to wager since you are so confident, i am confident my brother, i will put whatever you like the statement of the damages to be determined means just that the amount because we do mot have the revenue numbers, you are the one wishing, read it for what it is not the base he approved the base with the 792 request you need to understand the court system my friend. This order goes with the 792 not canceling them out!
Have you ever heard of denying in part? Well he didn't do that here so the 792 in its entirety is approved period. The 3.5 and 20.9 is in stone. The jury even awarded the 3.5 and in his order he acknowledges it. He can award triple damages if he wants due to willfulness but vringo didn't request it at trial, so he won't. They may in their brief coming up but they would be fools to because they had to do it at trial.
So you are wrong and reading and assuming things i am not assuming anything the facts support me if you disagree prove me wrong by showing me how the court system works and why i am wrong i pointed out how you was wrong you just throw out that i wish that is bullcrap and you know it produce facts you are so good at that remember. Show me where he denied the 20.9 and 3.5 of 792 in part you cant, so do t comment on it no more if you don't understand it you are trying to say you know and you obviously don't. Now i guess you come back with you have always been so wrong and predicted this or that blah blah blah, has nothing to do with this my friend i am right prove you theory, show me where he denied vringo 20.9 and 3.5 he didn't he approved it!!!
