![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Sunday, August 04, 2013 4:53:20 PM
Regardless, my post is NOT "totally wrong". My point is still 100% valid. I said this was not an entirely settled point and logically the judge was still taking the matter under consideration.
The language from the order supports my point. The order specifically says:
The Court FINDS that I/P Engine is entitled to supplemental damages for October 1, 2012 to November 20, 2012, in an amount to be determined...
The order speaks for itself. The judge is asking for VRNG's calculation. He is allowing GOOG to respond. He has not determined anything yet. Nothing has been guaranteed.
Let the story play out and stop "wishing" things to be the way you desperately hope they will be.
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM