Paychest Inc (PYCT)

[adanac]

DISSECTING THE REAL NUMBERS

4 YEARS OF TRACKING

@ UNDER .0001 for===1,368,344,398======UNDER $136,834.00
@ .0001 for=========14,174,470,918=========$1,417,447.00
@ .0002 for===========943,841,940============$188,768.00
2@ .0004 for============1,200,000============$480.00 (AUG 31/11)
2@ .0006 for==============58,000==============$35.00 (APR 1/11)
1@ .0006 for=============200,000=============$120.00 (JULY 17/13)

LET'S SAY THE "UNDER .0001s BOUGHT (BY MMs), WERE QUICKLY SOLD AT .0002 AND THE REST AT .0001.
WHO SOLD AT UNDER .0001, DON'T KNOW (NOT INSIDERS BECAUSE IT WOULD MEAN AT A LOSE (THEY FINANCED AT .0001)

1,368,344,398 MINUS 943,841,940 (.0002) EQUALS 424,502,485 (@.0001)

THAT LEAVES 13,748,968,433 TRADED STRAIGHT AT .0001

IF ONLY 20% 2,750,000,000 WERE ACCUMULATED (AND NOT TRADED AGAIN) BY REAL INVESTORS,

THAT WOULD STILL LEAVE 11,000,000,000 TO BE TRADED AT .0001, AS YOU SAY "bought and sold many many times over and in the penny world they are churned constantly. Ok, not so much with the BIG CHILL on..."

YOU WROTE:
What is GOOG's trading volume over the last 12 months and how does that total volume compare to their OS count?"

I DON'T THINK IT IS FAIR TO COMPARE US WITH "GOOG"

AT LEAST, NOT YET!!!

P.S.
GOOG JULY/13 AVG VOL = 2,419,800 * 22 = 53,235,600 *12 = 638,827,200