InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 5348
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/07/2008

Re: davidbrown post# 99900

Monday, 07/29/2013 9:21:11 AM

Monday, July 29, 2013 9:21:11 AM

Post# of 123600
NO, Im not saying that at all, the fact the product is good for the environment means NOTHING if tiny numbers of consumers will pay extra for the product. The majors have toyed with flushable pads a number of times going back several decades. They were poor sellers and production ended.

Consumers these days are looking for CHEAP. The average consumers budget is stretched to the breaking point. Even when world economies were way better several years ago when CES actually got test batches of product into WALMART and KMART the product still failed miserably and Banks (who owns the patents) was so desperate that he had to resort to stuffing the failed product story into a DOMINION of MELCHIZEDEK spawned scam shell whos previous venture was a failed Paypal competitor called PAYCHEST.COM - banking regulators took them down as soon as they started taking a few deposits. EBAY banned Paychest.com from the get-go.


Its me. Any questions?