InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,127.79
(
1.26%
)
US TECH 100
17,446.00
(
2.17%
)
Dow Jones
38,675.68
(
1.18%
)
Brent Oil
83.12
(
-0.01%
)
Bitcoin
64,173.99
(
0.27%
)
Post# of 115
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (5) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (5) Next 10 Prev Next

Srchn41

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 25
Posts 1401
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/11/2012

Srchn41

Re: Lawrence 147 post# 64

Thursday, 07/25/2013 3:23:31 PM

Thursday, July 25, 2013 3:23:31 PM

Post# of 115
Driving down the PPS is a two-edged sword for Hanover unless they have the company hold shares for them. If they continue to demand shares from Hanover then they are forced to sell at whatever PPS in order to stay under the 10% cap.

So far they show no inclination towards allowing SVFC to hold their shares. As I said before, if they quit transferring shares, the only logical reason I can think of is that Hanover has begun believing the PPS is set to explode.



Avoid wearing a wet leather helmet. It shrinks as it dries and creates tremendous intra-cranial pressure that may affect investment decisions.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (5) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (5) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up