Cdex, Inc. (fka CDEX)

[d4diddy]

The first amendment contained all the same claims with the exception that the phrase "actively cooled (sensor)" was added to the base claims. It was rejected. I believe the examiner again cited "anticipated" and gave reference to the claim in another patent.

I believe ontheedge (or his RB alias kidinsight) posted that it is clear to see what is revolutionary about the technology by reading the patent application.

I've asked him several times to please point out to us layman what he seems to think is revolutiuonary in the patent claims, but at this point he has failed to do so.

Can you please point it out to us Onetheedge?