Cdex, Inc. (fka CDEX)

[d4diddy]

After reviewing the complete "X-ray" patent wrapper it appears as if the first rejection was because the patent claims were obvious or anticipated.

That examiner cited previously patented material to draw that conclusion.

How can anything be revolutionary if it's already been anticipated by someone with ordinary skills in the art or is OBVIOUS! There is NOTHING revolutionary in the claims IMO.

When I first read the claims I opined that they would be rejected based solely on what is currently available on the market today. You cannot patent something that's already been reduced to practice and has been in the public domain for over a year.