InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 696
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/08/2010

Re: airlift post# 146571

Tuesday, 07/02/2013 10:01:23 PM

Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:01:23 PM

Post# of 157299
Airlift,

I agree with you. The reasons I got involved with this company were 1) the technology and 2) the experience and abilities of MC and GE to procure proper funding to make the company successful. Well, the technology continues to make great strides IMO and the funding has fallen on its face. The company has rightfully gone out of the box and outside the limits of the company to expand the tech base and product lines, and I whole heartedly applaud them for that. Yet, they don't seem to be able to use the same principles when it comes to funding this potentially very successful company. I don't understand it.

You are not the only one who has reached out to the company with potential private funding options. And, yes, GE, follow up on your voice mails and emails and see if a real option to get rid of LJC isn't right under your nose. We're here to help, HONEST.

Best,
bank

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.