InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 472
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/30/2010

Re: silver_bars post# 16134

Tuesday, 06/11/2013 12:07:36 PM

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:07:36 PM

Post# of 30000
MSX has already informed Lopehandia owns clean titles to Pascua. You may need to recheck your facts again and then ask yourself why Barrick still insists they are the owners of these concessions, then you may begin to understand the warnings to investors by MSX and why the Chile Judicial has accepted criminal charges against Barrick and the Chile Government.

Clearly Barrick wants/needs Mr Lopehandia's concessions due to the fact the area of mineralization lies within Lopehandia's clean titles as indicated within the “Albanez Report”.

silver bars quote:

If JL has clean title, then why does MSX continue to make the following disclosure in it's latest MD&A filed with SEDAR?;


"Lopehandia is currently disputing ownership of the property with Barrick Gold Corporation as the latter claims to own the Pascua Lama deposit and thus, the Mina Pascua deposit. The outcome of the dispute and accordingly the ability of the Optionor to convey the property rights to the Company are not determinable at this time".

.... it seems that MSX is talking out of both sides of it's mouth; saying one thing to investors in PR's, yet making a very distinct disclosure in regards to a undeterminable title on SEDAR... this disclosure is available for all the public to see; just go to SEDAR.COM and search "Mountainstar Gold Inc." and read the latest MD&A.



Monthly Progress Report
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.