Rambus (RMBS)

[smd1234]

Cal, We're not in synch.

I'm saying
1. the AT plea ultimately signed by MU will give them an argument to use the detrebling; however

2. the "requirements" provision in the detrebling statute says MU must have fessed up to Rambus in order to claim the detrebling benefit; so

3. IF NECESSARY (i.e., no settlement occurs), MU can - - at the last minute - - fess up to Rambus and still claim the detrebling benefit. How can they do that? The "requirements" provision in the detrebling statute has no temporal aspect.

NOTE: I think the detrebling statute is broad enuf in its language for MU to say "we were a successful leniency applicant in a criminal antitrust case involving the DRAM industry; this Rambus civil AT case IS ALSO 'an antitrust case involving the DRAM industry' SO WE ARE ENTITLED TO DETREBLING"