InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 338
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/08/2013

Re: None

Tuesday, 06/04/2013 7:18:17 PM

Tuesday, June 04, 2013 7:18:17 PM

Post# of 22017
All I was thinkin is that I'd rather lose my shirt from holding a few of these shares than having my short balls snip snip snipety cricket from old monkey midget. But seriously I don't get why you have to screw over all the people that wanted to go long on the company. I have heard of how weird things can happen like AAMRQ or something. Is this possible and would Wanxiang America help out citizens of Uncle Sam. Not to say I am a long on AONEQ, but had I been around I would have been sucked in to MIT NANO-PHOSPHATE batteries with FREAKEN military applications. I wish their was an actual discussion taking place about the technology and the automation that they achieved or maybe it was a logistical cluster BLAT. Either way I feel bad for all those who bought in to unprecedented technology at the time, maybe the goals were a little too lofty but gee whiz the american public should have studied the advancement of nanotechnology and how painstakingly slow it is. I just really wonder what happened. Thats my opinion and i hope if there is a chance somewhere in those SEC documents that this thing throws us something good.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.