InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 86
Posts 6674
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2003

Re: rachelelise post# 104001

Saturday, 12/10/2005 3:06:53 PM

Saturday, December 10, 2005 3:06:53 PM

Post# of 249968
Rachel---You write: "If all that was happening was a check on whether the machine was an apporved machine to run the Apple OS, then I would see other approaches. First surely there may be a way for the TPM and OS to interact on the client side or the server just check that state but manage nothing."

The above makes little sense to me.

Apple needs to be concerned about downloading content to non-Apple pcs that have been modified as authentic Apple/Intel machines. You achieve that by authenticating (ie the Embassy Server) that the PC hardware really is an Apple/Intel machine EACH and EVERY TIME content is downloaded to the machine. Why would an authentic Apple/Intel TPM 1.2 PC have the Apple OS continuously checking in to see if the TPM embedded inside is authentic or not?

I really don't see how Apple can avoid licensing the Embassy Server. The rational for Apple going to the TPM has been repeated ad nauseam in the press: HARDWARE AUTHENTICATION! Apple is terrified that modified PCs will try to emulate real Apple PCs, and thereby massively underminding their business model.

What am I missing?

WAVEs EMBASSY = THE COMMON DENOMINATOR "SWISS" DEFACTO PLATFORM FOR TRUSTED WEB SERVICES

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.