Pagan, what is with the personal bias? I ask you, what in these posts do you think I would NOT agree with? When have I recently predicted rising stock price? The company has much more substance now than it did eight months ago IMO. Yet stock price is lower.
IMO the company does not need performance to achieve rising stock price but what I have called "substantial" performance.
So what have I "glossed over" in your words? In a recent post I suggested all that I see for them short term is hard work. What is that glossing over?
So let me make it clear, I am positive about the company. I am agnostic about the stock price. Please do not accuse me of being positive about the stock price. I know too little about markets to be positive about the stock price. I don't personally care about the stock price except as to how it would cause the company to cease operations. My personal reward is a working, functioning company contributing useful products to a market.
I am positive about the company not because they have made it but because at least now there is a visible path where they COULD make it. So this doesn't turn into a rant, what specifically have I glossed over in your words? I would be eager to correct any inaccuracies in my recent representations of the company. Sincerely, IndyJonesOhio
