<<In fact, Sano, I challenge you to study those reports and rip them apart. I challenge you to tell me that they are somehow invalid. But before you do that, go to the RMOTC website and find out who they are, and what kinds of companies they work with. Perhaps if you can rip the RMOTC apart, then taking a shot at the validity of the reports will be easier.>>
I have read the report results but I have some technical questions that would be difficult to get a unbiased answer too here. I will withhold judgment until I can speak to my friends who owns a Oil Service company. He is CEO and and engineer so I will get a decent perspective from him. BTW I do think that low hours of testing is not adequate to do any type of major rollout. I would expect they would by NOW have 1000's of hours of data logged with all different types of oil and impurities run through this US test site. Why no further studies in the US? The testing in China is also puzzleing. Why would would they go offshore when the biggest pie is right here? If I understand this correctly the AOT device was tested in China for lengthy period of time. Why wouldn't the Chinese rely on the the US test results? Obviously the crude oil type and derivative has much to do with it...so testing only one type of field oil won;t necessarily give you the entire picture. Lastly if this is so plain to see by majors the deal would have been done on day 2 of the published report. All this talk of 6 months to get this or that done is nonsense. Companies like HAL or whoever are opportunist. If is easy for you and I to calculate the profit potential then imagine what HAL's team of MBAS could come up with. Wheres is the deal?
