InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 427
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/27/2012

Re: mr_sano post# 2366

Wednesday, 04/17/2013 10:15:55 AM

Wednesday, April 17, 2013 10:15:55 AM

Post# of 56510
Sano, let's say we agree with you. You are right, they have "a bunch of fulltime employees, high rent offices, generous managment comp packages, luxury auto expense, health benefits." You learned this information from reading the 10-K and the 10-Q's. 99% of us already know this information, so thank you for educating the 1% who did not know. Now we call this the "risks."

As you well know from commercial real estate investing (good job, you do well in that and you should stick to it) or any kind of investing that it's RISKS vs. BENEFITS.

Now that you have considered the risks. It's time for you to look at the benefits. In fact I challenge you look at the scientific reports produced by the Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center. And while you are at, take a look at the report PetoChina Pipeline R&D Center produced. These are we call the "benefits".

Every single investor here has weighted risks vs. benefits and found that it worth the risk.

In fact, Sano, I challenge you to study those reports and rip them apart. I challenge you to tell me that they are somehow invalid. But before you do that, go to the RMOTC website and find out who they are, and what kinds of companies they work with. Perhaps if you can rip the RMOTC apart, then taking a shot at the validity of the reports will be easier.

GLTA