InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 1141
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/11/2012

Re: sab63090 post# 31886

Wednesday, 04/17/2013 7:55:16 AM

Wednesday, April 17, 2013 7:55:16 AM

Post# of 68424
What it is in my view is an attempt to engage Vringo in settlement talks, attempting to extract the lowest possible offer. The whole attempt reeks. Read the email timeline I posted, and their subsequent schedule. The new expert Bartholomew Furrow is not available till June 7, how convenient. Why wasn't Mr. Furrow presented as an expert at trial so that his theory could be reviewed by the court and DR. Becker. If they had done that this would have been far more dangerous.

The most important question that cannot be answered is this. Assuming they have created some code that does not use Langs's patents, how long will it take to have it independently reviewed and most important will Google simply create this new code and abandon the cash cow they have now? Finally this does not change the willful infringement question. Until Google does all that I mentioned and puts this code into their live search engine they are liable for on-going royalties.