Plastic2Oil Inc (PTOI)

[loanranger]

"Who says the settlement is unenforceable?"
Until the Amended Final judgment is signed by Judge "I just sign 'em, somebody else reads 'em" Wolf, the Judgment is in conflict with the Consent. If you must argue that the settlement is enforceable, then you are arguing that the Final Judgment, which calls for an officer and director PROHIBITION, should be ignored. A Judgment wouldn't be overcome merely because "The parties appear to be in agreement on the settlement terms".....because that's not "all that matters". The settlement terms must be represented consistently in both the Consent and the Judgment regardless of perceptions or appearances.

"We have now moved from absurd to ridiculous. The judge did not make a "mistake.""
Call it what you want. He applied his signature, which is the only evidence of any input on his part into a process which apparently didn't include reading what he was signing, to a document that required an Amendment in order to be consistent with the agreement of the parties AND THE LAW (let's not forget the fraud stuff). He obviously should not have signed the original "Final Judgment" and I suspect that HE would have the integrity to admit that if asked. I call it a mistake.

I'm sure Judge Wolf is a very nice senior citizen who loves pets and children and will treat all the parties in the Grampp suit with consummate objectivity. This little faux pas shouldn't be brought to mind at all when he hears the name of The Defendant. Not to worry.