Natscore
English has little to do with my words not making sense,
your knowledge of Chilean mining laws and judicial system OR lack of it better, seems to be your short coming to understand truly.
perhaps you want me to reply to you in Spanish for clarity?
You asked for titles
My answer was clear and legally binding on title 100% you did not even acknowledged BAD PRACTICE for proper educated engagement.
I have clean title and Barrick admitted under oath in Court it had no title. You ignored that and jumped onto something else.
BAD PRACTICE indicates abuse of privilege, abuse of rights, non serious counterpart.
Now you are asking for judicial process decisions and other matters that are not title.
Venturing words and ideas that for me a person used to deal with facts only, is impossible to follow seriously or formally.
I do not answer to ifs what is and would this or that's... sorry.
Then, again, I am here to say how sad I am for MSX and Brent Johnson and not willing to become freely anyone's punch bag
or Chilean mining laws cyber instructor.
DD and learn.
Speculation and false statements DO NOT REPLACE TITLE OR LAW.
They twist it perversely only = to manipulate the truth into FEAR.
So if you asked about title IT, WAS SORTED OUT my previous two posts.
I you want to know more about trials and consequences? it is clear
1) Mining law is absolute.
2. If title imperfect, a Court will strike out once proven that title is dead or flawed, only. (as done v. AMARILLOS 1-3000 the LAC 1994 positions of ABX + TESOROS at law as that was CLAIM JUMP = PLAGIARISM by ABX + UNDA LLANOS 1997.
3) A decision from SUPREME COURT OF CHILE may only be changed by another SUPREME COURT DECISION so for ABX to undo my AMARILLOS SUR + AMARILLOS NORTE ABX would have to prove its legality and thus far are criminally charged so add up and conclude.
4) MSX wil inform more on court victories.
For now suffice to say that TITLE IS 100% clean non impeached and in my safe hands 1996-2013... such means ABX books are TAINTED 1994-2013
5) Fresh title 2013 means 100% of all documents are legal at this date. ABX could not even do that 2012... imagine 2013...
Having said so, there shall be no emotional baby sitting done by me or MSX of people whom in these boards have only shown disregard for law and contempt, preferring sick insults and innuendo or make believe positions that are far away from reality.
Nor will I repeat my answers for people claim I do not speak or write proper English, perhaps those people ignore Chilean and mining laws the way I do... ? and claim I speak gibberish?
Since I am unable it seems to speak or write clear English, the only tool left to humiliate me and MSX, I shall not be answering questions any longer, so please do refrain from asking them.
It is my privilege to post or not to post and have no obligation other than ethics and morals, to set the record straight.
It is my privilege to spend my time wisely to make MSX better, instead of baby sitting anxiety, greed or innuendo.
happy investment to everyone.
Only top topics shall be engaged and honored with answers.
When presented in a respectful and educated wise manner. ONLY.
You will learn after Saturday what happens Saturday.
I said I have clean title Barrick does not
Perfect title IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BE LOST AT LAW, impossible. Barrick never had title. I did.
You did not want to understand or read too fast or did not understand at all. I have clean titles emanating from a Court Judgment SUPREME COURT confirmed and validated + OBEYED by Mines Registrar as done.
From y clear explanations to your incoherent new questions + twisted comments and editorials, the question that begs to be answered is...
Is my English that bad and incoherent?
or is it that you just refuse to accept my title?
Or you lack ability to understand simple legal + title statements?
It easy to blame someone else for our short comings, yet, I believe that my previous posts were intended for anyone who has grade ten education.
Nevertheless I admit that I know people that only had grade five, however came across as highly educated individuals when speaking to them the same subject matters in Spanish, they were able to relate follow up and contribute. Sorry the title topic is hard.
Yes, English is not my mother tongue and I am not that well educated, enough to be able to properly convey facts or my sought, so please do not ask me for more tings.
Please, next time do your own DD to satisfaction and hire an English Speaking Chilean lawyer to explain you my facts.
Cheers.
AI
