InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 4371
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/26/2005

Re: None

Monday, 04/01/2013 11:51:41 AM

Monday, April 01, 2013 11:51:41 AM

Post# of 157299
In reviewing the last 3 quarterlies I was interested in the language used to describe the patents for the BIB and I believe it is clear the ongoing relationship with LTAS (and others) has had an influence..

First mentioned in August 14 Q 2 release...

"..in August 2012, we filed a provisional patent application on our “Blimp in a Box™ ”

Q 3 released Nov. 20, 2012..

all mention of BIB patents mentioned in Q 2 conspicuously absent.

Year end K filed Mar 29, 2013..

"We have also filed provisional patents in August 2012 for the apparatus and method for transporting and deploying an aerostat,"

And this new language never used previously in the section on all intellectual property...

"In certain cases, when appropriate, we opt to protect our intellectual property through trade secrets as opposed to filing for patent protection in order to preserve confidentiality."

m





Before dawn there is darkness. Then the sun rises on a new day.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.