InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 654
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/25/2012

Re: tobinator00 post# 29942

Friday, 03/29/2013 1:31:32 PM

Friday, March 29, 2013 1:31:32 PM

Post# of 68424
While I would love for your figures to be a reasonable base, I would question why you would assume that 100% of Bing's revenues would be generated by the Lang patents in question, when VRNG only argued 20% of value added for GOOG's searches. I would make the opposite assumption (and yes, it is an assumption) that probably Bing's revenue due to the Lang patent is similar to GOOG's, and thus 20% is a more likely base to use.......

otherwise.........I'm all for hoping YOU are correct!

thanks for your comments. I enjoy following them

arp