CYIOS Corporation (CYIO)

[Axle-and-Hub]

Greetings Fellow Readers and satelliteguy,

You wrote: "I'm not following most of your post, especially the "goose effect" part."

The "goose effect" is a process where 2 entities are involved . . . one creates the recommendation and the second party (cooperating) . . . fulfills the "expected price" with small quantity over priced purchases. Its a very short short term thing and then over a period of days, it is used as "proof" of the pattern coming.

But such is not the case with CYIO . . . it doesn't match that pattern.

Regarding your list of stocks you provided, it seems you have come up with the assumption first, then gone out to find stocks to match the example . . . rather than the other way around.

My point is much different . . . 9 out of 10 times movement like we've seen in this SPECIFIC stock situation - would be the result of "a leak of information" that then the writer finds out about, and 1 time out of 10 it might be because of what you are describing.

My reasons why your assumption is on a weak footing are as I expressed in past posts . . . much of the public float of this company is owned by investors who have a couple of percent of the public stock float INDIVIDUALLY. To own 2% of the public float last week required $2700 or less. My point is, this stock is not widely held - it is closely held. My point is I believe you are assuming a cause and effect that is not justified at this point - and then fitting examples to it.

My point is that easier and better justifications exist for the stock action we've seen this week, and you're going out of your way to find the most pessimistic one that is far less likely given the SPECIFICS of CYIO. Now other companies may be more likely with their specifics, but you have yet to show how CYIO fits the pattern with its specifics of ownership.

1 final thing to point out. Because of the unique public stock ownership mix of the company, it is possible for an individual to own more than 5% of the public float . . . yet NOT file for 5% ownership status. Just one week ago a regular individual could have owned 1.8 million shares with a total of $14,500 invested and still not declare 5% ownership. Why am I talking about this? Because I believe the number of investors in CYIO is very small and not easily manipulated like you assume.

But, time will tell the story if there is a leak anywhere in a long chain of people who might know about any new CYIO contracts, or if it is an elaborate manipulation instead. We'll see, but there appears to be no rush or current motivation for long term shareholders to sell in my opinion at this time.

But I'll be happy to consider your input if you come up with greater detail given CYIO specifics

Catch U later,

Axle-and-Hub