for those that are openly and consistently stating to "teach them a lesson" and vote no or believe an against vote is a far better option...explain how it is a better option... Having us go bankrupt is better how? And this is going to screw the shorts? And teach simes a lesson by keeping his job? Wherein he can easily dilute our shares through an offering to keep bpax afloat until he buries any resemblance of value left...and this is better than merging with a manufacturing company that would drive revenue for the products we developed...
do you believe simes brought the pps down through malice? No news and shorty are driving pps down...In the past 30 days we went up 25-30% and dropped in half as much time...why?
merger terms are not ideal, but this is a risk benefit situation...hold out on current terms, we may go at it alone, then what. We're not giving everything up with ANI on top, we are gaining a pharm manufacturing facility and resources for product marketing, on products we developed.
for those posting multiple times a day, please respond with a well thought out, coherent argument and with as little hyperbole as possible- with that, I can hopefully understand where you are coming from and will provide me the opportunity of making my vote with much more conviction, regardless of for or nay.
respectfully
RG
