InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1321
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/14/2003

Re: Paul P post# 17150

Wednesday, 11/16/2005 2:10:22 PM

Wednesday, November 16, 2005 2:10:22 PM

Post# of 53792
Paul

Actually this statement is right on:

You said : "Some people just don't understand risk and reward. If you take away the ability for shylocks to naked short their worst clients, they won't finance those clients in the first place, or at best they have to charge all of their clients more. So by removing risk from the worst investments, you lower the reward possible in the whole group."

The fact that Dutchess can short the stock and play both sides and the middle - they are not in the business to lose $$$ - I have been saying it all along. Why else would they give these companies with little or no cash - negative net worth $$$

A deal with the devil but these companies have no where else to go....of course they could get bank loans but they are normally personally guaranteed by mgmt - so if/when the company fails they cannot hide behind the corporate shield and they lose it all - house - marriage etc



These are my personal comments, observations, opinions and should not be relied upon for any investment decisions, and as always read the SEC filings for the facts of the company

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VTSI News