Friday, March 01, 2013 10:00:56 PM
Nonsense. Where in the proposed order is there a finding that fraud occurred? That's right, nowhere. You are making it up. Under the proposed order, the parties are waiving their rights to both factual findings and conclusions of law, and the order itself contains no such findings. Got a link that says a judge's approval of a settlement constitutes a finding in favor of one party to the settlement? Of course you do not.
Nonsense again. Where in the settlement documents does it state the language you have quoted? That's right, nowhere. You are again making it up. Or more precisely, you are quoting from the Complaint, but then misrepresenting that it is the "settlement that says" that language.
Hmmmmmm......
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM
Snakes & Lattes Opens Pop-Up Location at The Wellington Market in Toronto: A New Destination for Fun and Games - Thanks 'The Well', PepsiCo, Indie Pale House & All Sponsors & Partners for Their Commitment & Assistance Throughout The Process • FUNN • Jun 13, 2024 8:18 AM
HealthLynked Introduces Innovative Online Medical Record Request Form Using DocuSign • HLYK • Jun 12, 2024 8:00 AM
Ubiquitech Software Corp (OTC:UBQU) Posts $624,585 Quarterly Revenue - Largest Quarter Since 2018 • UBQU • Jun 11, 2024 10:13 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Files for OTCQB Uplisting, Provides Financial Update • ELEM • Jun 11, 2024 9:25 AM