InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1270
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/17/2012

Re: homeslice10 post# 24236

Saturday, 02/23/2013 10:56:10 AM

Saturday, February 23, 2013 10:56:10 AM

Post# of 26138
Is it possible that all this ambiguity was put in place intentionally to prompt a NO vote?

Just the fact that we just had a 1:6 r/s and now we're heading into another with a yet to be determined ratio?
Being told to vote YES by a firm (Egan-Jones) that has just had a ton of bad press questioning their ethics.
Publication after publication with experts attesting to the efficacy of T for women and yet a low valuation for Libigl?

Is there another example out there where a company did just this? Just like we read one Monday morning that GVAX had been sold; we could read one day that Libigel is sold pre-merger and the CVRs are just a red herring fakeout.
I am waiting until the last day to vote. Too much drama still unfolding. I really want to hear what Susan Davis has to say next week.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.