News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257580
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122988
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: RockRat post# 156854

Tuesday, 02/12/2013 1:46:36 PM

Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:46:36 PM

Post# of 257580
Re: FDA disclosure policy on ANDA/351(k) trade secrets

I believe FDA's hands are tied here… Seems to me FDA is forced to require the same testing of all applicants and to inform them what that testing is.

I strongly disagree. There is no FDA requirement that all ANDA/351(k) applicants for a given branded drug use the same exact testing methods for ensuring sameness to the branded drug and batch-to-batch consistency. Nor is the FDA likely to spoon-feed a second or third applicant the testing methods used by the first successful applicant, as was done in the Lovenox case; indeed, doing so, might subject the FDA to a lawsuit by the successful applicant for illegal disclosure of proprietary technology (which is a separate legal issue from the H-W Safe Harbor per se).

The bottom line, IMO, is that the generic-Lovenox case was sui generis. From now on, the FDA will behave differently to avert destruction of the economic foundation of the generic-drug/FoB industry (#msg-84460897).

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today