News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 842
Posts 122793
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: RockRat post# 156854

Tuesday, 02/12/2013 1:46:36 PM

Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:46:36 PM

Post# of 257253
Re: FDA disclosure policy on ANDA/351(k) trade secrets

I believe FDA's hands are tied here… Seems to me FDA is forced to require the same testing of all applicants and to inform them what that testing is.

I strongly disagree. There is no FDA requirement that all ANDA/351(k) applicants for a given branded drug use the same exact testing methods for ensuring sameness to the branded drug and batch-to-batch consistency. Nor is the FDA likely to spoon-feed a second or third applicant the testing methods used by the first successful applicant, as was done in the Lovenox case; indeed, doing so, might subject the FDA to a lawsuit by the successful applicant for illegal disclosure of proprietary technology (which is a separate legal issue from the H-W Safe Harbor per se).

The bottom line, IMO, is that the generic-Lovenox case was sui generis. From now on, the FDA will behave differently to avert destruction of the economic foundation of the generic-drug/FoB industry (#msg-84460897).

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now