InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251621
Next 10
Followers 827
Posts 119499
Boards Moderated 15
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: RockRat post# 156854

Tuesday, 02/12/2013 1:46:36 PM

Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:46:36 PM

Post# of 251621
Re: FDA disclosure policy on ANDA/351(k) trade secrets

I believe FDA's hands are tied here… Seems to me FDA is forced to require the same testing of all applicants and to inform them what that testing is.

I strongly disagree. There is no FDA requirement that all ANDA/351(k) applicants for a given branded drug use the same exact testing methods for ensuring sameness to the branded drug and batch-to-batch consistency. Nor is the FDA likely to spoon-feed a second or third applicant the testing methods used by the first successful applicant, as was done in the Lovenox case; indeed, doing so, might subject the FDA to a lawsuit by the successful applicant for illegal disclosure of proprietary technology (which is a separate legal issue from the H-W Safe Harbor per se).

The bottom line, IMO, is that the generic-Lovenox case was sui generis. From now on, the FDA will behave differently to avert destruction of the economic foundation of the generic-drug/FoB industry (#msg-84460897).

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.