InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 44
Posts 2774
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/26/2004

Re: panlprofits post# 2968

Thursday, 11/10/2005 8:08:56 PM

Thursday, November 10, 2005 8:08:56 PM

Post# of 79921
"1) Though PBLS is pink, management is nonetheless prohibited from out and out lying to investors, hence, there is no PBLS-caused dilution, . "

Careful here if you are banking on what managment is percieved to be saying- the safe harbor is very tricky business and I think managment has been sufficently vague in there conversations to shareholders- and especially in their PRs.



Also - TNOG another pinky has been off on and on the SHO list while PBLS has not- indicating to me that shorting has been covered- at least to any major degree with PBLS.

I'm continually amazed that more longs are "OK" with the T/A being gagged. The most obviuos answer to why the stock is drifting lower during all the "accumulation" is either the company is selling shares and/or shares were used to fund several aquisitions and in turn are being sold . Now if PBLS is indeed selling shares here to raise cash-- to then buy back 100 mil shares- what does that tell you they think the share price will be in the near term? I mean- this is all hypothetical- but seems like selling into each pr will force the price down and inturn let PBLS load up at a much better price- all speculation- but this Evil market maker stuff is easily solved with a simple move by PBLS- Ungag the Transfer agent ! All in my opinion ofcourse!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.