Saturday, February 02, 2013 2:45:19 PM
For example, expired patents count as prior art, but have no legal standing.
Furthermore, most patents cite prior art in the application as does JBI. It is the improvement on the prior art that is the patentable aspect.
If the truth be known, I suspect that very few pyrolysis patents will withstand a court challenge since pyrolysis has a very long history. Since there has been little prior financial success with pyrolysis there have been no court challenges that I am aware of on pyrolysis patents.
It maters not. JBI has figured out how to make pyrolysis work well. The catalyst in a key part of that as are the numerous engineering details. All of which can be kept as trade secrets.
As far as the engineering details go, those would possibly qualify for patent protection as improvement on prior art. JBI will have to decide if it want's to disclose those details in a patent or will be better off keeping them as a trade secret.
OMG! It's an Inverted Spinglefluke formation. Nothing left to do except release the KRAKEN.
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM