Rambus (RMBS)

[smd1234]

I think the issue was this: will DJ's testimony be narrow in scope to fit with the narrow deposition testimony he gave in VA, or will he be allowed to more broadly describe the events leading up to and through the DRP adoption (and implementation?).

Nuke thinks Stone fooled Hynix into allowing the latter, giving them the right to depose DJ in advance, by waiving ACP.

I still don't see an answer to the Q - why wouldn't RMBS counter allegations of bad faith by using "advice of counsel"??? The only plausible theory I have is that DJ was "out of the loop" too early in the implementation to provide any meaningful help on RMBS's good faith in its DRP implementation.

smd