Has anyone done a comparison between the effectiveness of by-the-book AIM and a system which sells 10% of the initial holding by number of shares when the price rises by each 10%, and buys a further 10% when the price drops by each 10%? The shares sold are bought back if/when the price drops back again by 10%, and the shares bought or bought back after price declines are sold if/when the price rises back by 10%.
It would seem to be a little more aggressive in that standard AIM waits for a 15% increase and then sells only 5%, similarly with further buying on price declines, so perhaps it would be more suitable for lower volatility securities.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.