InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 1069
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/08/2010

Re: iluvsitong post# 49110

Friday, 01/18/2013 1:28:45 PM

Friday, January 18, 2013 1:28:45 PM

Post# of 94142
I'd say theory #2, Intertek results sucked, is by far the most likely out of the 3. The scam theory is pretty unlikely, not a very productive scam if it drags on for years and years with no volume, no dilution, nothing. The internal disagreement is also unlikely if they have a great product. They might argue for a bit but sooner or later they'll all want to make money and something is better than nothing.

I'd add theory #4, product is decent, they agree what to do with it, no horrible test results but they are just incredibly incompetent and/or not motivated and they keep messing up over and over.

And theory #5, everything is ok and they are genuinely trying but bringing this to market is just very complex and despite doing their best it's taking forever. I'd like to believe this but all the progress PRs that were proven to be false prove that they have no problem with misleading investors...

Hope we find out soon which it is, getting a bit tired of this.