![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Friday, January 18, 2013 1:00:05 PM
1. Realistically if they had a good product that they had tested in house they should be more confident, like they were (or pretended to be) before.
2. There is no reason to need two months since the test was initially failed (because lets face it that's what happened) to try it again. How long does it take to order a piece of testing equipment? Two weeks, assuming slow ground shipping...
3. There is no reason not to take some basic measurements, temp in, temp out, flow rate and current once they were already at Intertek. No reason whatsoever and the basic equipment needed for that was 100% available, it must have been since they sheduled the test.
My guess is when Intertek hooked the device to their testing equipment the results sucked and now they are scrambling to do something about it. The sad part is we are obviously kept in the dark and pretty much lied to...
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM