InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 1069
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/08/2010

Re: Gatz post# 49105

Friday, 01/18/2013 1:00:05 PM

Friday, January 18, 2013 1:00:05 PM

Post# of 94141
So now the language is all IF it pans out, WE HOPE results are good and only know the date in coming WEEKS... This is looking really bad.

1. Realistically if they had a good product that they had tested in house they should be more confident, like they were (or pretended to be) before.
2. There is no reason to need two months since the test was initially failed (because lets face it that's what happened) to try it again. How long does it take to order a piece of testing equipment? Two weeks, assuming slow ground shipping...
3. There is no reason not to take some basic measurements, temp in, temp out, flow rate and current once they were already at Intertek. No reason whatsoever and the basic equipment needed for that was 100% available, it must have been since they sheduled the test.

My guess is when Intertek hooked the device to their testing equipment the results sucked and now they are scrambling to do something about it. The sad part is we are obviously kept in the dark and pretty much lied to...