InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 2178
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2012

Re: runandadd post# 143534

Friday, 01/18/2013 12:24:25 PM

Friday, January 18, 2013 12:24:25 PM

Post# of 157300
I was familiar with this subcontractor before--and any products of his that were similar. I have used his products in fact. As I have stated, I see good evidence that the lower box of the first prototype BiB has been replaced with a trailer but that trailer had to be modified to make the BiB launching mechanisms work. The differences are subtle but important IMO. I assume for vehicle mounting the lower box of the BiB has to be added back in. We still aren't sure whether this is a trailer-based sale or a vehicle mounted sale. The original BiB blimp envelope would have bobbed around a lot if driven at 35mph IMO. This undersail aerostat will do much better IMO. There are also some joint innovations on fabric, envelope design and envelope interior that I can detect from the text and the photos. Apparently, however WSGI retains the IP on these innovations. Best analysis I have at the moment. Definitely not a re-label IMO. JMO, though. IndyJonesOhio
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.