InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,459.10
(
1.11%
)
US TECH 100
18,648.00
(
0.70%
)
Dow Jones
40,589.34
(
0.00%
)
Brent Oil
80.00
(
-0.71%
)
Bitcoin
69,449.46
(
2.44%
)
Post# of 157299
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

indyjonesohio

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 27
Posts 2178
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2012

indyjonesohio

Re: Jetmek_03052 post# 143308

Thursday, 01/17/2013 9:30:39 AM

Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:30:39 AM

Post# of 157299
Jet, would you count this sale directly for delivery to an Army unit (as the press release says) as an aviation related sale for 2013? My guess is two initial units. For me the GTC sale explains why they had to do some dancing around since December to align the contract vehicle. Still, they only missed their 10-Q 2012 aerostat sales target by 17 days--2 1/2 weeks. I think they can be given that on their first aerostat contract IMO. This is very good work IMO. Credit where credit is due. Best regards, IndyJonesOhio.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up