InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 3671
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2011

Re: BeerIsGood post# 49038

Wednesday, 01/16/2013 9:27:32 AM

Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:27:32 AM

Post# of 94146
I am under the impression the control circuitry and/or its software/firmware is not functioning to spec. Remember the delay of the first (I think it was first) scheduled Intertek timeline was because the magnetrons were found to be not firing correctly, so Robert had to go rewrite "the protocol" for the testing so that the magnetrons would be configured for each test manually.

Thermocouples that I am aware of are metalic and their measurements depend on the clectric current/boltage generated between the coupled metals. Microwaves will impact that making the measures not a function just of the thermocouple materials and the temperature but also of the irradiation (microwaves). In other words, spurious signals would get generated.

Anyway, entry/exit analysis would be sufficient for the mandate. Placing per chamber measurement requirement on Intertek could only be due to desire/need to go back to engineering level and/or desire/need to cause delay. IMO

pinpoint measurement of temp - at a location
imagine - many many pinpoint measurements - overkill