Thank you for the most interesting comments on a public company.
First, as I posted I see this stock as a speculative play, and possibly as a speculative investment.It as a speculative investment I am looking for basic answers to determine how much to invest.
Second, it is the company not I that brings up the NI43-101 report.For a company with under $5,000 in the bank I couldnt imagine why they would spend money on such a report,and in fact their coments about a report they have prepared internally according to NI43-101 guidelines makes sense. Of course one would expect as a public reporting company that is required to release material information that they of course do so. Read any NI43-101 report and compare to SEC Guide 7 and mining company 10k reports you will see quickly the NI43-101 contains information not found in US filings. As an example, NI43-101 reports can quote inferred resoruces, SEC filings do not include this. The NI43-101 requires information to be included and manner of preparing, the SEC except for general guidelines in SEC Guide 7 and past practice doesnt spell out requirements lile NI43-101.
Third, good point that what information is available is available in the sources you mention I just dont understand sorry why it is unreasonable that certain basic questions the company doesnt address especially since it is rather obvious a rising stock price will increase their chances of success. Of course if they dont know answers doesnt mean that it is not a good speculative play- I actually think it is, but could be a great one if management actually has apath to production that is credible. I am unaware that asking a company what capital do they forecast is required is an unreasonable question.
No I am not asking company to do more marketing and understandable that CFO doesnt manage the company by chat rooms.I do expect though that a publiccompany releasesmaterial information as they are required to do so. I dont care if they dont know, just that sharehodlers understand basic situation.
