good morning red and pack! looks like you guys are the only ones who are on board per my post trying to get at the end of what is really going on with fcpg. somewhat surprised, then again not at all. anyway, this morning i did receive back a response from my email from an individual named Brad Long, Investors Relations, FCPG. Not totally unexpected, it was an email that pointed me to past releases, sec, so on and so forth.I did thank him (Brad Long) for the response. however I followed up with a couple of quick questions. the first being that the information provided was readily available and did not answer the inquiry of what fcpg is doing now to improve shareholder value. it was a suggestion, as many on this board have also ponted out, is why fcpg does not simply create a link where a current shareholder, or new, or prosepctive shareholder could go to and get updated once or twice a month. to be fair to brad, i did disclose that i have worked with so called emerging comapany's prior, and this type of process is routine for concerns like fcpg who want to update shareholders, and more importantly, the associated costs are minimal at best. the second question was if he, brad long, was an employee of fcpg, or if he was being paid by fcpg via evergreen as a spokesperson. if it were the later, please provide a link to evergreen so interested party's could see whom they work with. hopefully we get a response to both. my best guess is that brad simply fields emails of the nature i sent, and returns with classic point and click answers. fcpg does have from all of us that can see, positive news to report, and why it is not done is anyone's guess. the premise that fcpg has to pay 'x' dollars for a pr and that cost is excessive is bs ---- sorry to offend anyone. glad to see volume still has been higher than recent months, and with any news of consequence, the pps will start to move up. that is my intent plain and simple. david
