Ren...thank you for pointing these out.
I am cautiously optimistic, but I see with this adaption of another's system, while perhaps a synergy of strength as Indy opines, I am troubled that a dilution of IP is occuring.
< I dont think the removal of the specific language of retaining the lifting gas indicates it no longer does so. >
The removal of reference to the IP in the latest 10Q, despite BJ's note it is still "active" does not answer my specific question "is it still viable as submitted"...in fact, it has now become even fuzzier with the variables in PR's so noted.
Perhaps I worry to much about IP protection, but I sense a compromise to get a sale at work here and be first to market.
Removal of language to me is not a good sign.
m
Before dawn there is darkness. Then the sun rises on a new day.
