I wasn't the tape painter, that is all I will say. But if you think somebody should of won on GLMB based on a 70% rise in the stock price (as of thursday) in a week on no real volume and no news. Then I have to respectfully disagree. So it was okay to tape at .19 this morning? It was okay to tape paint at .17 on thursday close. Is the idea to get the most accurate results possible? Is it not fair to say? That most of the volume this week was done in the .13-.14 range? I don't get the outrage here, actually I do. If It was tape painted the other way I get other people saying whats the point, because realistic there is no way you could sell at that high price. And if it tape painted down, this was inaccurate representation of the price and unfair. The truth is there was no way I could make everyone happy in this PSL Contest, especially this contest as I was unhappy. Having said that would you want someone to win off a tape painter, because that is what clearly happened on thurday, or lose on a tape painter on friday. The truth is most of the volume this week was in the .13-.14 range, it close in that range. People are in a uproar, but the stock accurately reflect where you could of really sold it this week or even today for that matter? Look all I want really is people to drop this. Partipate in the next contest, we all can acknowledge the rules were somewhat more flawed in PSL 22, but those problems will be fixed, and perhaps one of themost exciting contests I have introduced will be on it's way in the new year. So please try to all get along, I don't want this blowing up like it happened a couple of months ago. I knew GLMB was going to do this too, where there was going to be somebody displeased whether is was painted up or down. Heck the stock at one point today had a .13/.19 spread, as one knows I buy lower volume stocks but the liquidity in this stock is absurd. All is just my opinion, and I could always be wrong though.
AI
