InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 935
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/23/2011

Re: pumpkin1 post# 12482

Thursday, 12/13/2012 6:38:00 PM

Thursday, December 13, 2012 6:38:00 PM

Post# of 30000
My take is that Barrick were banking on Jorge and Brent to be brushed off by the Courts ...the same ones in which they decided to try and discredited this high ranking Judge. They were also banking on the "Concession" to be what Mr Andy Lloyd says that they can mine gold, silver and cooper with within the Pascua Lama area of which Jorge is deemed to be the owner of the Chilean side within certain perimeters.

Now it gets even better ...Barrick decides to fudge the Protocol based on false ownership and to set there biggest asset in terms of processing etc on the Argentine side of the Border. We'll just build a tunnel over to Chile and scoop up all their resources and take them out through Argentina were they have not been scrutinized to the same degree as on the Chilean side.

Now the tables have turned on them ...they have little invested in Chile in the scope of their total operation in the Andes. They may be able to mine the existing staked and owned properties but if they lose the Protocol they will have to split their operations and then deal with the Chilean Mining Ministry whom they have defrauded along with their investors, the commissions and the banks worldwide …good luck moving anything out of Chile

I see Barrick Gold Corp in serious trouble and I question all of the hoops that Henry the Miner posted to lay Criminal Charges against the Barrick Staff in Canada ...I would sure like clarification on that from someone in the know ...anyway have a great evening pumpkin

goldapnner
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.