InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 482
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/14/2012

Re: Seasound post# 14255

Wednesday, 12/12/2012 11:55:33 AM

Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:55:33 AM

Post# of 29204
Your response was taken down (okay it was put back up while I was composing my response,) but I will nevertheless attempt to clarify mine. First there is and was no attempt to spread fear, FUD, WAF, etc. We each have to deal with our investments the best we can.

Deficiency Notice. If a company does not meet the minimum bid price or market value of public float requirements for 30 consecutive trading days, Nasdaq sends a "deficiency notice" identifying the listing deficiency and informing the company that it will be delisted after 90 calendar days unless it meets the required minimum bid price or market value of public float for at least 10 consecutive trading days during the 90-day cure period. If the deficiency is based on insufficient market capitalization, the company is notified after 10 consecutive trading days and must achieve compliance for 10 consecutive trading days within 30 calendar days. Nasdaq employs an automated computer system to track compliance by each listed company with these requirements. If the deficiency is based on insufficient net tangible assets, total assets, total revenue or pretax income, the notice is usually triggered by public filing of an SEC report (typically a Form 10-K or 10-Q) disclosing the deficiency.

Capt'n -- This is why I sought input and debate. As you pointed out the deficiencies listed in the last sentence of the above may may negate the $1.00 minimum--I honestly don't know, but since we haven't received a notice yet perhaps you are correct. Sorry about the link--I had a Q&A link up and thought that I had linked to that.

As to my comment According to my charts Capstone has failed to maintain the pps above $1.00 for 10 consecutive days since October 8, 2012. I'll stand pat on that one as my charts support it.

I agree with you also that fuel cells have their own issues, but again, I started out the post with reference to Static UPS vs Rotary in Data Centers. The three alternative static solutions that I am aware of are fuel cells, batteries, and super capacitors. The later two still depend on another power source (grid or back-up) kicking in prior to them depleting to maintain UPS. I am certainly not a fan of a container, or basement full, of diesel engines and still believe that Capstone is a much better solution than that.

As far as ACPW they offer a box full of diesels--enough said on that subject.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.