InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 42
Posts 5093
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/10/2012

Re: F2 post# 1909

Friday, 12/07/2012 11:15:05 AM

Friday, December 07, 2012 11:15:05 AM

Post# of 195889
When we have a company like this one where with a history of a lack of accountability I think it's worth the time to send emails about things that aren't happening that you thought would. If anything do it for your own documentation, it could be important to have at some point down the road.

If we were told there would a Leonberger proof of concept before the end of the year and you don't think it'll happen why wouldn't you ask if it's still on track? And if it's not ask who is responsible for the delay. I disagree about this company being worth either $.01 or $100, that attitude allows bad things to happen. And maybe if years ago more people got angry about misleading statements or promises that weren't kept then more effective leadership would have been in place sooner. Then maybe we'd be worth $2 or $3 instead of $1. So many screw ups in the past and the shareholders are the ones who suffer. With that in mind if they decide to do a acquisition like some have speculated, if we use stock we'll get more than twice the dilution that we could have otherwise.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LWLG News