InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 78
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/04/2005

Re: rachelelise post# 98995

Monday, 10/24/2005 1:13:57 PM

Monday, October 24, 2005 1:13:57 PM

Post# of 249977
rachel, very simply, remove the patents and what remains as leverage at the negotiating table?! as SKS stated, he doesn't want to "hit 'em over the head with patents" -- it about parlaying the patents into a commercial application!

"patent positioning is a technique to introduce risk or shift the conversation to a different set of analytics."

PRECISELY MY POINT: when discussing Wave's prototype applications and/or services with potential "customers", i don't think converstions directly address IP issues -- i suspect most converstions [with potential "customers"] are squarely focused on how those applications and/or services may be monetized mmost effectively -- BUT I'M CERTAIN THAT THOSE "customers" WOULD NOT ENGAGE WITH AND POTENTIALLY PAY WAVE FOR SOMETHING THAT THEY COULD COPY AND USE WITHOUT CONSEQUENCE -- far as i'm concerned, the patents are the big stick in the background providing for silent leverage.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.