InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 1499
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/20/2011

Re: I-Glow post# 75862

Thursday, 12/06/2012 10:41:31 AM

Thursday, December 06, 2012 10:41:31 AM

Post# of 167964
Wow, that a real leap. So because the two PRs were worded the same, one man = the other man? Would that stand up in a court of law? Come on. I'm all for "facts" that may prove my perception of this company is not correct, but I'm supposed to base my trust in this company because the wording was the same? Could they have just been lazy and resused the old wording as a template?